Recent trials in the UK and in Holland have shown that a street with fewer lights, signs and road markings can actually make crowded roads safer. These so-called 'Naked Streets' allow traffic to flow freely (and slowly) while drivers seem to take extra care and give more consideration to other road users.
I also wonder if by removing some of the street furniture we might make our environments simpler to understand at a glance. As experience designers we know that every element within range of our senses competes for our attention. Each aspect that needs to be processed and understood takes time, time that might otherwise be spent on looking out for the unexpected. Indeed all of this reminds me of the old saying that a design is complete when there is nothing else (superfluous) left to take away.
Hi Owen - nice post, naked streets can have some advantages but they can cause problems for partially sighted people and/or people that use guide dogs (I understand that dogs are generally taught to observe the edge of the pavement and they hesitate without this cue). I guess it's a complex problem when lots of different types of people use a product or environment.
Posted by: Chris Lowe | 22 October 2009 at 10:43 PM
Thanks Chris. You raise an important point and I can see that changes to street layout and furniture may cause problems for some users. I guess that in cities / areas where this approach is adopted the training of guide dogs may need to be reviewed. Or perhaps there are other measures that could be taken to help people relying on guide dogs?
Posted by: Owen | 23 October 2009 at 11:07 AM